November 20-21, 2017
Advances in the environmental health sciences – from high-throughput cell-based in vitro studies to tissue chips to environment-wide association studies – have led to new approaches to understanding the toxicity of chemicals in humans. These new approaches are faster, less expensive, and potentially more comparable to real-life human exposures than legacy animal toxicity testing approaches. However, many questions remain about whether and how to make the paradigm shift to using new data streams as the basis for the wide array of research, policy, and regulatory decisions.
This workshop will explore key factors that influence how scientists, policymakers, risk assessors, and regulators incorporate new science into their decisions. Participants will discuss empirical social science evidence on issues such as perceptions on the type and quantity of data that is “sufficient” for different types of decisions and trust in decisions influenced by new types of data. Case studies from different decision contexts will be used to investigate key considerations and questions about what builds confidence in new scientific approaches among members of the environmental health community.
This workshop will be webcast
Registration will open in September 2017
Workshop Organizing Committee: John Bucher, National Toxicology Program; Stanley Barone, Environmental Protection Agency; Kevin Elliott*, Michigan State University; Gary Ginsberg*, Connecticut Department of Public Health; Melissa Perry*, George Washington University; Kristi Pullen Fedinick*, Natural Resources Defense Council; Jennifer McPartland, Environmental Defense Fund; Patrick McMullen, CitoVation; Heather Patisaul, North Carolina State University; John Vandenberg, Environmental Protection Agency.
*Members of the Standing Committee on Emerging Science for Environmental Health Decisions