What institutional barriers are keeping life scientists from communicating to the public about their work? While issues in the life sciences find increasing relevance in public dialogue — environmental change, health and medicine, food security, among others — there appears to be little in the way of institutional or societal commitment and infrastructure to support the communications activities of life scientists. At the same time, some organizations are exploring new or alternate models for supporting life scientists as they interact with various publics.
Leaders from the life sciences community and from research organizations explored the current landscape of public communication of the life sciences. The workshop addressed many challenges life scientists face, policy restrictions in government, incentives and adequate support structures at the university level, and intellectual property issues in industry. Participants also highlighted new opportunities and models of communications. The workshop concluded with discussions about the funding landscape for life scientist communicators and the building blocks needed to develop sustainable infrastructures for life science communication.
- Workshop Summary
- Presentations (PDF)
- Videos Day 1
- Videos Day 2
- Commentary & Conversation: independent perspectives; views do not necessarily reflect those of the workshop participants, the members of the Public Interfaces Roundtable, or the National Academy of Sciences.
- Building a Metro for Science Communication, by Brooke Smith
- Leveraging Rhetoric for Improved Communication of Science: A Scientist’s Perspective, by Jamie Vernon
- National Academies Host Sci-Comm Workshops, Cellular Culture, the Office Science Outreach Blog of ASBMB
- #NASInterface Day 1, Storify by COMPASS
- #NASinterface Day 2: Where to Invest?, Storify by Ivan Gonzalez
Organizers: Kenneth Ramos, University of Arizona (co-chair); Brooke Smith, COMPASS (co-chair); May Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Rick Borchelt, US Department of Energy; Bruce Lewenstein, Cornell University; Stephen Palacios, Added Value Cheskin